the term with 1/h or 1/sqrt(q) in DLMF expression (this term and following ones were not included). I truncated the asymptotic expression at the first term that was a reciprocal in q, i.e. However, one thing I’d comment on is that the “analytical expression” I used to compare the SciPy result against is just the first few terms of the “large q limit” expression from DLMF, so I’m not sure how reliable it is as a benchmark. Thank you for the fix, I really appreciate it! I’m not too familiar with how REFINE works and how necessary it is to have it, so I don’t think I’d be able to give a good assessment of which solution is better, but from the sound of it, it seems like with your second approach, the benefits of REFINE are maintained and the bumps caused by it are avoided, which sounds better than just not using REFINE, assuming that the error reduction due to REFINE is somewhat crucial for most applications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |